top of page

Rachel Speght

Biography

Rachel Speght was born in London, England in 1597. Her father was an ordained doctor from Christ's college in Cambridge, rector of two churches and an author of religious tract. Her Mother on the other hand died sometime during 1617-1621 and very little is known about her. However Speght's mother had a huge impact on her life which can be seen throughout many of her writings and was even an inspiration for one of her writing "Mortalities Memorandum" . Despite not attending college and her age Speght was well educated in many areas along the lines of classical curriculum which included: Classical texts, Christian Texts, Latin and logic. At the Age of 19, she publishes the piece "A Mouzell for Melastomus", a rebuttal to Joseph Swetnam's misogynistic pamphlet, where she not only dismantled Swetnam's argument by using the same evidence but by reinterpreting scripture and using logic based facts to influence not only her writing but the advancement of women. Later at the age of 24, she not only married to William Procter, A Calvinist minister, she also published her second piece of work "Mortalities Memorandum"  which is a collection of poems that defend the need for women's education to improve both their minds and their souls. The poems also go in depth about preparation of death and meditation.

"Good had it beene for you to haue put on that Muzzell, which Saint Lance would haue all Christians to weare; Speake not euill one of another"

My Thoughts

I'm completely biased on this women. I believe her work is amazing for someone with no schooling and at such a young age. The amount of knowledge she held in comparisons to Swetnam was astounding. She not only knew the complete scripture with out paraphrasing but she then interprets the bible with such fluidity , it's amazing.

Other resources

Need more information on this amazing women? Give this podcast a listen.

Themes

Speghts's work was response piece to Swetnam, correcting his ignorance on women and their purpose and how women were not just created to be subservient to men. She uses Scripture, literature and his analogy's and metaphors in order to completely dismantle his argument. 

 "yet was shee not produced from Adams foote, to be his too low inferiour; nor from his head to be his superiour, but from his side, neare his heart, to be his equally"

bottom of page